"The significant problems we face cannot be solve

by the same level of thinking that created them"

Albert Einstein

 

 

Home
About
Contact Us
 
 

 

 

This is the personal site of Michael Hawthorne - retired steelworker, semi-professional college student, currently enrolled in Antioch University's Ph.D. in Leadership and Change program and adjunct professor of Economics for Vincennes University's satellite campus on the San Diego, California Naval bases.

Mavericks have been described as being independent in thought and action, individuals who view things differently and not only consider alternatives to traditional ways of doing things, but act on those alternatives.  The original Maverick (Samuel A.) died in 1870 and did not brand the calves he let wander the open range - hence "maverick" has become synonymous with doing things against the mainstream.

However, is a person who attempts an alternative solution to traditional problems really a Maverick (as described above) or a person using sound critical thinking skills?  The following definition of critical thinking comes from "Ph.D. in Leadership and Change: in the Professions" - a handout for the Ph.D. in Leadership and Change program at Antioch University - where I am currently enrolled:

 

"Critical thinking is conceptualized as an intellectual ability that identifies and challenges assumptions and the basis for points of view, that questions the adequacy of evidence and substantiation, that challenges the importance of context and weighs opinions, that imagines and explores alternatives, and that engages in reflective skepticism.  An individual's ability to hold a critical stance and to question and reappraise, to challenge certain ways of behaving, to be skeptical of claims to neutrality and objectivity, is often viewed as an indicator of maturation and development."

 

In the case of Samuel A. Maverick:  Did he just go against the mainstream (refusing to brand his cattle), thus giving the dictionary a new term to define "maverick", or was it something else?  I propose that sound critical thinking skills led him to conclude - with everyone else's cattle having a burned patch of hide, it would be easier to spot his from a distance, thus saving the time and energy of having to get close to the animal to distinguish the brand. 

At present this site is limited to just this home page.  However, over time, I will be adding additional pages that I hope will encourage people to practice thinking critically about events, people, things, etc.

If you have comments or suggestions, please feel free to email me at: Michael@MaverickThinking.com

 

 

Copyright 2007 - "Maverick Thinking"